Bibliography¶

Albers & Lakens, 2018: Albers, C., & Lakens, D. (2018 , January). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 187–195. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004
Alberton et al., 2020: Alberton, B. A.V., Nichols, T. E., Gamba, H. R., & Winkler, A. M. (2020 , August). Multiple testing correction over contrasts for brain imaging. NeuroImage, 216, 116760. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116760
Anvari & Lakens, 2018: Anvari, F., & Lakens, D. (2018 , September). The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 266–286. doi:10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822
Arain et al., 2010: Arain, M., Campbell, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2010 , December). What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 67. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-67
Baillie et al., 2022: Baillie, M., Le Cessie, S., Schmidt, C. O., Lusa, L., Huebner, M., & for the Topic Group “Initial Data Analysis” of the STRATOS Initiative. (2022 , February). Ten simple rules for initial data analysis. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(2), e1009819. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009819
Banerjee et al., 2009: Banerjee, A., Chitnis, U., Jadhav, S., Bhawalkar, J., & Chaudhury, S. (2009). Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(2), 127. doi:10.4103/0972-6748.62274
Barbour, 2006: Barbour, V. (2006 , May). The impact of open access upon public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(5), 339–339. doi:10.2471/BLT.06.032409
Baumgartner et al., 2023: Baumgartner, H. A., Alessandroni, N., Byers-Heinlein, K., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Soderstrom, M., … Coles, N. A. (2023). How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), 230235.
Bazeley, 2003: Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining 'Early Career' in Research. Higher Education, 45(3), 257–279. doi:10.1023/A:1022698529612
Bolt et al., 2021: Bolt, T., Nomi, J. S., Bzdok, D., & Uddin, L. Q. (2021 , July). Educating the future generation of researchers: A cross-disciplinary survey of trends in analysis methods. PLOS Biology, 19(7), e3001313. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001313
Bond & Paterson, 2005: Bond, R., & Paterson, L. (2005 , September). Coming down from the ivory tower? Academics' civic and economic engagement with the community. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 331–351. doi:10.1080/03054980500221934
Botvinik-Nezer et al., 2020: Botvinik-Nezer, R., Holzmeister, F., Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., … Schonberg, T. (2020 , June). Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature, 582(7810), 84–88. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9
Bourne, 2005: Bourne, P. E. (2005). Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published. PLoS Computational Biology, 1(5), e57. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010057
Bourne, 2007: Bourne, P. E. (2007). Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(4), e77. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030077
Bourne & Chalupa, 2006: Bourne, P. E., & Chalupa, L. M. (2006). Ten Simple Rules for Getting Grants. PLoS Computational Biology, 2(2), e12. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020012
Bourne & Friedberg, 2006: Bourne, P. E., & Friedberg, I. (2006). Ten Simple Rules for Selecting a Postdoctoral Position. PLoS Computational Biology, 2(11), e121. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020121
Bourne et al., 2017: Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017 , May). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
Bradley & Lang, 2017: Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2017). Zeigler-Hill, V., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.). International Affective Picture System. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–4). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Brand et al., 2015: Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015 , April). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. doi:10.1087/20150211
Breck et al., 2019: Breck, E., Polyzotis, N., Roy, S., Whang, S., & Zinkevich, M. (2019). Data Validation for Machine Learning. MLSys.
Brembs, 2019: Brembs, B. (2019 , February). Reliable novelty: New should not trump true. PLOS Biology, 17(2), e3000117. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000117
Bruns et al., 2019: Bruns, S. B., Asanov, I., Bode, R., Dunger, M., Funk, C., Hassan, S. M., … Buenstorf, G. (2019 , November). Reporting errors and biases in published empirical findings: Evidence from innovation research. Research Policy, 48(9), 103796. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.005
Bzdok & Yeo, 2017: Bzdok, D., & Yeo, B.T. T. (2017 , July). Inference in the age of big data: Future perspectives on neuroscience. NeuroImage, 155, 549–564. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.061
Chandrakar, 2006: Chandrakar, R. (2006). Digital object identifier system: an overview. The Electronic Library, 24(4), 445–452.
Cohen, 1962: Cohen, J. (1962 , September). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. doi:10.1037/h0045186
Contaxis et al., 2022: Contaxis, N., Clark, J., Dellureficio, A., Gonzales, S., Mannheimer, S., Oxley, P. R., … Holmes, K. (2022 , February). Ten simple rules for improving research data discovery. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(2), e1009768. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009768
Day et al., 2020: Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020 , December). Open to the public: paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. doi:10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y
Endel & Piringer, 2015: Endel, F., & Piringer, H. (2015). Data Wrangling: Making data useful again. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(1), 111–112. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.197
Evans & Reimer, 2009: Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009 , February). Open Access and Global Participation in Science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5917), 1025–1025. doi:10.1126/science.1154562
Fan et al., 2014: Fan, J., Han, F., & Liu, H. (2014 , June). Challenges of Big Data analysis. National Science Review, 1(2), 293–314. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt032
Flake & Fried, 2020: Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020 , December). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. doi:10.1177/2515245920952393
Forscher et al., 2020: missing journal in forscher2020benefits
Franz et al., 2016: Franz, M., Lopes, C. T., Huck, G., Dong, Y., Sumer, O., & Bader, G. D. (2016 , January). Cytoscape.js: a graph theory library for visualisation and analysis. Bioinformatics, 32(2), 309–311. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv557
Freire, 2021: Freire, D. (2021). How to Improve Data Validation in Five Steps. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3812561
Gelman & Loken, 2013: Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University, 348, 1–17.
Goodman et al., 2014: Goodman, A., Pepe, A., Blocker, A. W., Borgman, C. L., Cranmer, K., Crosas, M., … Slavkovic, A. (2014 , April). Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(4), e1003542. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542
Gorgolewski et al., 2017: Gorgolewski, K. J., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Auer, T., Bellec, P., Capotă, M., Chakravarty, M. M., … Poldrack, R. A. (2017 , March). BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(3), e1005209. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209
Hall et al., 2018: Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., Huang, G. C., Serrano, K. J., Rice, E. L., Tsakraklides, S. P., & Fiore, S. M. (2018 , May). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 532–548. doi:10.1037/amp0000319
Hallinan et al., 2023: Hallinan, D., Boehm, F., Külpmann, A., & Elson, M. (2023 , January). Information Provision for Informed Consent Procedures in Psychological Research Under the General Data Protection Regulation: A Practical Guide. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 251524592311519. doi:10.1177/25152459231151944
Harnad, 2003: missing booktitle in Harnad_2003
Haroz, 2022: missing journal in haroz2022comparison
Hartgerink et al., 2017: Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. (2017). Too good to be false: nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 9.
Haucke et al., 2021: Haucke, M., Hoekstra, R., & Van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2021). When numbers fail: do researchers agree on operationalization of published research? Royal Society Open Science, 8(9), 191354.
Hedge et al., 2018: Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018 , June). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
Henderson & Chambers, 2022: Henderson, E. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2022 , October). Ten simple rules for writing a Registered Report. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(10), e1010571. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010571
Houtkoop et al., 2018: Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2018 , March). Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70–85. doi:10.1177/2515245917751886
Hoy, 2020: Hoy, M. B. (2020 , January). Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 39(1), 84–89. doi:10.1080/02763869.2020.1704597
In, 2017: In, J. (2017). Introduction of a pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(6), 601. doi:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601
Ivimey-Cook et al., 2023: Ivimey-Cook, E. R., Noble, D. W., Nakagawa, S., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Pick, J. L. (2023). Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 14(6), 911–915.
Jabre et al., 2021: Jabre, L., Bannon, C., McCain, J. S. P., & Eglit, Y. (2021 , September). Ten simple rules for choosing a PhD supervisor. PLOS Computational Biology, 17(9), e1009330. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009330
Jana, 2019: Jana, S. (2019 , December). A history and development of peer-review process. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66, 152–162.
Jin et al., 2023: Jin, H., Wang, Q., Yang, Y.-F., Zhang, H., Gao, M. (Miranda), Jin, S., … Chuan-Peng, H. (2023 , January). The chinese open science network (cosn): building an open science community from scratch. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 25152459221144986. doi:10.1177/25152459221144986
John et al., 2012: John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012 , May). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
Jones, 2003: Jones, S. (2003 , September). An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(5), 453–458. doi:10.1136/emj.20.5.453
Kandel et al., 2011: Kandel, S., Heer, J., Plaisant, C., Kennedy, J., Van Ham, F., Riche, N. H., … Buono, P. (2011). Research Directions in Data Wrangling: Visualizations and Transformations for Usable and Credible Data. Information VisualizationInformation Visualization, 10(4), 271–288. doi:10.1177/1473871611415994
Kemal, 2020: Kemal, O. (2020 , April). Power Analysis and Sample Size, When and Why? Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 58(1), 3–4. doi:10.5152/tao.2020.0330
Kent et al., 2022: Kent, B. A., Holman, C., Amoako, E., Antonietti, A., Azam, J. M., Ballhausen, H., … Weissgerber, T. L. (2022 , July). Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLOS Biology, 20(7), e3001680. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680
Kismihok et al., 2022: Kismihók, G., McCashin, D., Mol, S. T., & Cahill, B. (2022 , September). The well-being and mental health of doctoral candidates. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 410–423. doi:10.1111/ejed.12519
Kornfield, 2019: Kornfield, S. (2019 , September). Gallagher, J., & DeVoss, D. (Eds.). Revise and Resubmit! But How? Explanation Points (pp. 259–262). Utah State University Press.
Kroon et al., 2022: Kroon, C., Breuer, L., Jones, L., An, J., Akan, A., Mohamed Ali, E. A., … Weissgerber, T. L. (2022 , September). Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them. PLOS Biology, 20(9), e3001783. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001783
Laine, 2017: Laine, H. (2017 , June). Afraid of Scooping – Case Study on Researcher Strategies against Fear of Scooping in the Context of Open Science. Data Science Journal, 16, 29. doi:10.5334/dsj-2017-029
Lakens, 2014: Lakens, D. (2014 , December). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses: Sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2023
Lakens, 2022: Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: psychology, 8(1), 33267.
Lewis, 2018: Lewis, L. S. (2018). Scaling the ivory tower: Merit and its limits in academic careers. Routledge.
Li & Hall, 2019: Li, C.-L., & Hall, N. G. (2019). Work package sizing and project performance. Operations Research, 67(1), 123–142.
Loenneker et al., 2024: Loenneker, H. D., Buchanan, E. M., Martinovici, A., Primbs, M. A., Elsherif, M. M., Baker, B. J., … others. (2024). We don't know what you did last summer. on the importance of transparent reporting of reaction time data pre-processing. cortex, 172, 14–37.
Maestre, 2019: Maestre, F. T. (2019 , April). Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(4), e1006914. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006914
Manghani, 2011: Manghani, K. (2011). Quality assurance: Importance of systems and standard operating procedures. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2(1), 34. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.76288
Marx, 2013: Marx, V. (2013 , June). The big challenges of big data. Nature, 498(7453), 255–260. doi:10.1038/498255a
Matthews, 2018: Matthews, D. (2018 , May). Virtual-reality applications give science a new dimension. Nature, 557(7703), 127–128. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-04997-2
Mensh & Kording, 2017: Mensh, B., & Kording, K. (2017 , September). Ten simple rules for structuring papers. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(9), e1005619. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005619
Meyer, 2018: Meyer, M. N. (2018 , March). Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 131–144. doi:10.1177/2515245917747656
Michener, 2015: Michener, W. K. (2015 , October). Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
Noble, 2009: Noble, W. S. (2009 , December). How does multiple testing correction work? Nature Biotechnology, 27(12), 1135–1137. doi:10.1038/nbt1209-1135
Noble, 2017: Noble, W. S. (2017 , October). Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(10), e1005730. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005730
Nosek & Errington, 2017: Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2017 , January). Making sense of replications. eLife, 6, e23383. doi:10.7554/eLife.23383
Pain, 2021: Pain, E. (2021 , May). How to navigate authorship of scientific manuscripts. Science (New York, N.Y.). doi:10.1126/science.caredit.abj3459
Palminteri, 2023: Palminteri, S. (2023 , February). How to Prepare a Rebuttal Letter: Some Advice from a Scientist, Reviewer and Editor. PsyArXiv.
Parsons et al., 2022: Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahim, O. N., Govaart, G. H., … Aczel, B. (2022 , March). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 312–318. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4
Pautasso, 2013: Pautasso, M. (2013 , July). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
Peikert et al., 2021: Peikert, A., Van Lissa, C. J., & Brandmaier, A. M. (2021 , December). Reproducible Research in R: A Tutorial on How to Do the Same Thing More Than Once. Psych, 3(4), 836–867. doi:10.3390/psych3040053
Pek & VanZandt, 2020: Pek, J., & Van Zandt, T. (2020 , March). Frequentist and Bayesian approaches to data analysis: Evaluation and estimation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 21–35. doi:10.1177/1475725719874542
Peloquin et al., 2020: Peloquin, D., DiMaio, M., Bierer, B., & Barnes, M. (2020 , June). Disruptive and avoidable: GDPR challenges to secondary research uses of data. European Journal of Human Genetics, 28(6), 697–705. doi:10.1038/s41431-020-0596-x
Pennington, 2023: Pennington, C. (2023). A student's guide to open science: Using the replication crisis to reform psychology. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Powell, 2016: Powell, K. (2016 , November). Hard work, little reward: Nature readers reveal working hours and research challenges. Nature, p. nature.2016.20933. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20933
Riesenberg, 1990: Riesenberg, D. (1990 , October). The Order of Authorship: Who's on First? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(14), 1857. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450140079039
Ross-Hellauer et al., 2020: Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., Banelytė, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., … Vignoli, M. (2020 , April). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(4), e1007704. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007704
Roseler et al., 2024: missing journal in roseler2024replication
Sakaluk, 2016: Sakaluk, J. K. (2016 , September). Exploring Small, Confirming Big: An alternative system to The New Statistics for advancing cumulative and replicable psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 47–54. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.013
Salinas & Munch, 2015: Salinas, S., & Munch, S. B. (2015 , January). Where Should I Send It? Optimizing the Submission Decision Process. PLOS ONE, 10(1), e0115451. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115451
Scheel et al., 2021: Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. R. M. J., & Lakens, D. (2021 , April). An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 251524592110074. doi:10.1177/25152459211007467
Schnell, 2015: Schnell, S. (2015 , September). Ten Simple Rules for a Computational Biologist's Laboratory Notebook. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(9), e1004385. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004385
Sharma et al., 2014: Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014 , April). Journal Impact Factor: Its Use, Significance and Limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(02), 146–146. doi:10.4103/1450-1147.139151
Smith et al., 2023: Smith, S., Bergmann, T. O., Forstmann, B., Dagher, A., Keilholz, S., Kennedy, K., … others. (2023). Imaging neuroscience opening editorial. Imaging Neuroscience, 1, 1–4.
Stratton, 2021: Stratton, S. J. (2021 , August). Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373–374. doi:10.1017/S1049023X21000649
Suls & Martin, 2009: Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2009 , January). The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 40–50. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01105.x
Tay, 2021: Tay, A. (2021 , January). Researchers are embracing visual tools to give fair credit for work on papers. Nature Index.
Thabane et al., 2010: Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., … Goldsmith, C. H. (2010 , January). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 1. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-1
Toth et al., 2021: Toth, A. A., Banks, G. C., Mellor, D., O'Boyle, E. H., Dickson, A., Davis, D. J., … Borns, J. (2021 , August). Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(4), 553–571. doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09695-3
Tregoning & McDermott, 2020: Tregoning, J. S., & McDermott, J. E. (2020 , February). Ten Simple Rules to becoming a principal investigator. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(2), e1007448. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007448
Tripathy et al., 2017: Tripathy, J. P., Bhatnagar, A., Shewade, H. D., Kumar, A. M. V., Zachariah, R., & Harries, A. D. (2017 , March). Ten tips to improve the visibility and dissemination of research for policy makers and practitioners. Public Health Action, 7(1), 10–14. doi:10.5588/pha.16.0090
VanZyl, 2018: Van Zyl, C. J.J. (2018 , December). Frequentist and Bayesian inference: A conceptual primer. New Ideas in Psychology, 51, 44–49. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.06.004
Vicens & Bourne, 2007: Vicens, Q., & Bourne, P. E. (2007). Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(3), e44. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030044
Weissgerber, 2021: Weissgerber, T. L. (2021 , July). Learning from the past to develop data analysis curricula for the future. PLOS Biology, 19(7), e3001343. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001343
Wilkinson et al., 2016: Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … Mons, B. (2016 , March). The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Zook et al., 2017: Zook, M., Barocas, S., Boyd, D., Crawford, K., Keller, E., Gangadharan, S. P., … Pasquale, F. (2017 , March). Ten simple rules for responsible big data research. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(3), e1005399. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005399
Nature Human Behavior, 2021: Nature Human Behavior. (2021 , July). How (not) to appeal. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 805–806. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01174-w
Soskic et al., 2023: Šoškić, A., Kovic, V., Algermissen, J., Fischer, N. L., Ganis, G., Gau, R., … Styles, S. J. (2023 , January). Artem-is for erp: agreed reporting template for eeg methodology - international standard for documenting studies on event-related potentials. OSF. URL: https://osf.io/mq5sy, doi:10.31234/osf.io/mq5sy

ARIADNE

Bibliography

Bibliography¶